![]() ![]() ![]() You might find that more interesting to fiddle with. Modular, or 2600 doesn't do that so conveniently.Ģ600 is interesting, more raw, more organic sounding, though you can't pick and choose as many modulation sources and destinations as you can with Modular. However, Matrix has the layering of patches, as does CS80. It has some issues when both osc's are perfectly in tune - there's some inconsistent phase thing going on that makes each voice sound different. The envelopes don't sound as snappy or as fast as Modular, or 2600. It sounds kind of 'softer', 'mushier' compared to Modular. Matrix looked so promising to me, and it's great with heaps of different modulation but for me it does not sound as snappy or responsive as Modular. The filter switches have been added Thanks Be to Arturia!. Envelopes are not as snappy or intense as other Arturia apps. Intense low pass filter sweeps will also move the hi pass cutoff even if you don't want that. V2 is fine,it all works ok, but V3 is quite hobbled in that regard. ![]() However at the moment there's something wrong with it and you cannot turn off the high pass filter. The CS80 is a beast unto its own, quite different, and at first a bit difficult to predict what's going to happen, but has some great features. Out of all of them, for subtractive.Modular in my opinion, is the most versatile, and has the most variation in basic audio characteristics, followed by 2600, then SEM. I've been using the 2600, Matrix, CS80 and Modular, SEM ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |